Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Angel Gomes remove | Jordan Zemura remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 25 | 26 |
| Position | Attacking midfielder | Left midfielder |
| Club · league | Olympique Marseille · Ligue 1 | Udinese Calcio · Serie A |
| League strength | 0.88 | 0.93 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1477 | 1442 |
| League minutes | 1357 (40%) | 1128 (33%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.20 | 0.16 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 78 | 71 |
| Market value | €10.0M | €5.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €4.8M – €10.7M | €1.6M – €4.4M |
| Model value | €6.4M – €14.8M | €4.2M – €8.8M |
| Projected value (24m) | €3.6M – €11.9M | €2.3M – €5.3M |
| Bargain Index | 26/100 | 85/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€4.8M – €10.7M Model value (performance-implied)€6.4M – €14.8M Projected value (24 months)€3.6M – €11.9M Dashed line: current market value (€10.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€1.6M – €4.4M Model value (performance-implied)€4.2M – €8.8M Projected value (24 months)€2.3M – €5.3M Dashed line: current market value (€5.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Angel Gomes and Jordan Zemura
- Zemura is estimated to cost far less (€2.2M vs €8.4M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Zemura (Bargain Index 85 vs 26) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.