Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Ryan Sessegnon removeDavid Møller Wolfe remove
Age2624
PositionLeft-backLeft-back
Club · leagueFulham FC · Premier LeagueWolverhampton Wanderers · Premier League
League strength1.301.30
Team strength (Elo)15761425
League minutes1822 (53%)1048 (31%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.300.17
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.300.27
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile8977
Market value€22.0M€8.0M
Estimated acquisition€10.3M – €20.8M€4.8M – €11.4M
Model value€11.8M – €33.7M€4.9M – €11.2M
Projected value (24m)€8.6M – €26.1M€3.9M – €8.5M
Bargain Index65/10016/100
DevelopmentLowModerate
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskLowModerate
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€10.3M – €20.8M
Model value (performance-implied)€11.8M – €33.7M
Projected value (24 months)€8.6M – €26.1M
Dashed line: current market value (€22.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€4.8M – €11.4M
Model value (performance-implied)€4.9M – €11.2M
Projected value (24 months)€3.9M – €8.5M
Dashed line: current market value (€8.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Ryan Sessegnon and David Møller Wolfe

  • Sessegnon was used far more by the club (53% of minutes vs 31%).
  • Wolfe is estimated to cost far less (€8.1M vs €13.8M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Sessegnon (Bargain Index 65 vs 16) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Sessegnon Low, Wolfe Moderate.