Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Brenden Aaronson removeAlexis Claude-Maurice remove
Age2528
PositionAttacking midfielderAttacking midfielder
Club · leagueLeeds United · Premier LeagueFC Augsburg · Bundesliga
League strength1.300.94
Team strength (Elo)15211421
League minutes2470 (72%)2108 (69%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.330.38
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.490.46
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile8576
Market value€22.0M€15.0M
Estimated acquisition€9.9M – €23.3M€5.1M – €13.2M
Model value€8.4M – €31.9M€4.1M – €11.8M
Projected value (24m)€12.7M – €31.1M€5.3M – €12.3M
Bargain Index94/10057/100
DevelopmentModerateLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskLowLow
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€9.9M – €23.3M
Model value (performance-implied)€8.4M – €31.9M
Projected value (24 months)€12.7M – €31.1M
Dashed line: current market value (€22.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€5.1M – €13.2M
Model value (performance-implied)€4.1M – €11.8M
Projected value (24 months)€5.3M – €12.3M
Dashed line: current market value (€15.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Brenden Aaronson and Alexis Claude-Maurice

  • Aaronson is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Aaronson plays in a stronger league (1.30 vs 0.94); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
  • Claude-Maurice is estimated to cost far less (€6.8M vs €13.2M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Aaronson (Bargain Index 94 vs 57) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.