Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Tobias Lawal removeAlban Lafont remove
Age2627
PositionGoalkeeperGoalkeeper
Club · leagueKRC Genk · Jupiler Pro LeaguePanathinaikos Athlitikos Omilos · Super League 1
League strength0.650.42
Team strength (Elo)14711465
League minutes1620 (60%)1395 (60%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.000.00
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.000.00
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile5155
Market value€2.0M€3.0M
Estimated acquisition€882k – €2.4M€978k – €3.4M
Model value€1.0M – €3.9M€1.1M – €3.2M
Projected value (24m)€902k – €3.8M€1.5M – €3.9M
Bargain Index74/10088/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskModerateModerate
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€882k – €2.4M
Model value (performance-implied)€1.0M – €3.9M
Projected value (24 months)€902k – €3.8M
Dashed line: current market value (€2.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€978k – €3.4M
Model value (performance-implied)€1.1M – €3.2M
Projected value (24 months)€1.5M – €3.9M
Dashed line: current market value (€3.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Tobias Lawal and Alban Lafont

  • Lawal plays in a stronger league (0.65 vs 0.42); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
  • On value for money the model prefers Lafont (Bargain Index 88 vs 74) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.