Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Roman Kvet remove | Peter Michorl remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 28 | 31 |
| Position | Attacking midfielder | Attacking midfielder |
| Club · league | FCV Dender EH · Jupiler Pro League | APS Atromitos Athinon · Super League 1 |
| League strength | 0.65 | 0.42 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1207 | 1237 |
| League minutes | 2476 (92%) | 1933 (83%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.18 | 0.23 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 32 | 25 |
| Market value | €1.2M | €500k |
| Estimated acquisition | €345k – €895k | €130k – €595k |
| Model value | €627k – €1.7M | €357k – €759k |
| Projected value (24m) | €399k – €1.1M | €224k – €447k |
| Bargain Index | 74/100 | 76/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€345k – €895k Model value (performance-implied)€627k – €1.7M Projected value (24 months)€399k – €1.1M Dashed line: current market value (€1.2M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€130k – €595k Model value (performance-implied)€357k – €759k Projected value (24 months)€224k – €447k Dashed line: current market value (€500k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Roman Kvet and Peter Michorl
- Kvet is 3 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- Kvet plays in a stronger league (0.65 vs 0.42); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
- Michorl is estimated to cost far less (€249k vs €459k mid-estimate).