Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| James Justin remove | Kyle Walker-Peters remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 28 | 29 |
| Position | Right-back | Right-back |
| Club · league | Leeds United · Premier League | West Ham United · Premier League |
| League strength | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1521 | 1520 |
| League minutes | 1896 (55%) | 1380 (40%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.14 | 0.07 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.22 | 0.13 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 84 | 81 |
| Market value | €12.0M | €12.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €4.8M – €12.6M | €4.3M – €11.7M |
| Model value | €7.9M – €18.8M | €4.0M – €13.4M |
| Projected value (24m) | €4.4M – €9.6M | €3.2M – €7.4M |
| Bargain Index | 45/100 | 14/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€4.8M – €12.6M Model value (performance-implied)€7.9M – €18.8M Projected value (24 months)€4.4M – €9.6M Dashed line: current market value (€12.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€4.3M – €11.7M Model value (performance-implied)€4.0M – €13.4M Projected value (24 months)€3.2M – €7.4M Dashed line: current market value (€12.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates James Justin and Kyle Walker-Peters
- Justin was used far more by the club (55% of minutes vs 40%).
- On value for money the model prefers Justin (Bargain Index 45 vs 14) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Justin Low, Walker-Peters Moderate.