Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Justin de Haas removeFelix Beijmo remove
Age2628
PositionCentre-backCentre-back
Club · leagueFC Famalicão · Liga PortugalAarhus GF · Superliga
League strength0.580.47
Team strength (Elo)14061441
League minutes2790 (91%)1888 (95%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.160.24
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.140.14
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile5445
Market value€7.0M€3.0M
Estimated acquisition€3.9M – €10.0M€723k – €3.8M
Model value€1.1M – €5.6M€686k – €2.6M
Projected value (24m)€4.1M – €11.4M€1.6M – €3.7M
Bargain Index43/10074/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskModerateModerate
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€3.9M – €10.0M
Model value (performance-implied)€1.1M – €5.6M
Projected value (24 months)€4.1M – €11.4M
Dashed line: current market value (€7.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€723k – €3.8M
Model value (performance-implied)€686k – €2.6M
Projected value (24 months)€1.6M – €3.7M
Dashed line: current market value (€3.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Justin de Haas and Felix Beijmo

  • Haas is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Beijmo is estimated to cost far less (€2.0M vs €7.0M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Beijmo (Bargain Index 74 vs 43) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.