Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Lutsharel Geertruida remove | Kyle Walker-Peters remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 25 | 29 |
| Position | Right-back | Right-back |
| Club · league | Sunderland AFC · Premier League | West Ham United · Premier League |
| League strength | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1496 | 1520 |
| League minutes | 1685 (49%) | 1380 (40%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.00 | 0.07 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.09 | 0.13 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 84 | 81 |
| Market value | €20.0M | €12.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €10.2M – €23.1M | €4.3M – €11.7M |
| Model value | €9.3M – €21.5M | €4.0M – €13.4M |
| Projected value (24m) | €9.4M – €18.6M | €3.2M – €7.4M |
| Bargain Index | 36/100 | 14/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€10.2M – €23.1M Model value (performance-implied)€9.3M – €21.5M Projected value (24 months)€9.4M – €18.6M Dashed line: current market value (€20.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€4.3M – €11.7M Model value (performance-implied)€4.0M – €13.4M Projected value (24 months)€3.2M – €7.4M Dashed line: current market value (€12.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Lutsharel Geertruida and Kyle Walker-Peters
- Geertruida is 3 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- Walker-Peters is estimated to cost far less (€6.8M vs €17.0M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Geertruida (Bargain Index 36 vs 14) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Geertruida Low, Walker-Peters Moderate.