Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Nathan Rôdes remove | Ángel Algobia remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 28 | 27 |
| Position | Defensive midfielder | Defensive midfielder |
| Club · league | FCV Dender EH · Jupiler Pro League | Avs Futebol · Liga Portugal |
| League strength | 0.65 | 0.58 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1207 | 1182 |
| League minutes | 1463 (54%) | 1081 (35%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.00 | 0.08 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.07 | 0.19 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 19 | 13 |
| Market value | €600k | €500k |
| Estimated acquisition | €176k – €455k | €151k – €355k |
| Model value | €452k – €1.5M | €352k – €884k |
| Projected value (24m) | €210k – €590k | €306k – €727k |
| Bargain Index | 73/100 | 99/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€176k – €455k Model value (performance-implied)€452k – €1.5M Projected value (24 months)€210k – €590k Dashed line: current market value (€600k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€151k – €355k Model value (performance-implied)€352k – €884k Projected value (24 months)€306k – €727k Dashed line: current market value (€500k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Nathan Rôdes and Ángel Algobia
- Algobia has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.19 vs 0.07 per 90).
- Rôdes was used far more by the club (54% of minutes vs 35%).
- On value for money the model prefers Algobia (Bargain Index 99 vs 73) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.