Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Christopher Scott remove | Matisse Samoise remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 24 | 24 |
| Position | Left midfielder | Right midfielder |
| Club · league | Royal Antwerp FC · Jupiler Pro League | KAA Gent · Jupiler Pro League |
| League strength | 0.65 | 0.65 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1365 | 1403 |
| League minutes | 1328 (49%) | 1374 (51%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.20 | 0.26 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.24 | 0.25 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 31 | 40 |
| Market value | €2.2M | €2.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €1.3M – €3.7M | €1.1M – €3.4M |
| Model value | €679k – €1.8M | €1.2M – €3.5M |
| Projected value (24m) | €984k – €3.9M | €1.1M – €3.6M |
| Bargain Index | 27/100 | 53/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€1.3M – €3.7M Model value (performance-implied)€679k – €1.8M Projected value (24 months)€984k – €3.9M Dashed line: current market value (€2.2M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€1.1M – €3.4M Model value (performance-implied)€1.2M – €3.5M Projected value (24 months)€1.1M – €3.6M Dashed line: current market value (€2.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Christopher Scott and Matisse Samoise
- On value for money the model prefers Samoise (Bargain Index 53 vs 27) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Scott High, Samoise Moderate.