Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Neco Williams removeTrai Hume remove
Age2524
PositionLeft-backRight-back
Club · leagueNottingham Forest · Premier LeagueSunderland AFC · Premier League
League strength1.301.30
Team strength (Elo)16351496
League minutes3206 (94%)3039 (89%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.140.09
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.170.17
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile9683
Market value€28.0M€22.0M
Estimated acquisition€17.6M – €37.7M€13.7M – €30.7M
Model value€30.4M – €42.1M€6.3M – €30.5M
Projected value (24m)€18.6M – €40.4M€14.2M – €34.9M
Bargain Index37/10057/100
DevelopmentModerateModerate
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskLowLow
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€17.6M – €37.7M
Model value (performance-implied)€30.4M – €42.1M
Projected value (24 months)€18.6M – €40.4M
Dashed line: current market value (€28.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€13.7M – €30.7M
Model value (performance-implied)€6.3M – €30.5M
Projected value (24 months)€14.2M – €34.9M
Dashed line: current market value (€22.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Neco Williams and Trai Hume

  • On value for money the model prefers Hume (Bargain Index 57 vs 37) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.