Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Tyreece John-Jules remove | Said Hamulic remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 25 | 25 |
| Position | Striker | Striker |
| Club · league | Kilmarnock FC · Scottish Premiership | Volou Neos Podosferikos Syllogos · Super League 1 |
| League strength | 0.31 | 0.42 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1104 | 1129 |
| League minutes | 1152 (39%) | 1014 (43%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.78 | 0.53 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.83 | 0.71 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 8 | 13 |
| Market value | €1.0M | €400k |
| Estimated acquisition | €378k – €1.6M | €129k – €526k |
| Model value | €281k – €1.2M | €322k – €932k |
| Projected value (24m) | €525k – €1.6M | €275k – €596k |
| Bargain Index | 60/100 | 99/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€378k – €1.6M Model value (performance-implied)€281k – €1.2M Projected value (24 months)€525k – €1.6M Dashed line: current market value (€1.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€129k – €526k Model value (performance-implied)€322k – €932k Projected value (24 months)€275k – €596k Dashed line: current market value (€400k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Tyreece John-Jules and Said Hamulic
- John-Jules has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.83 vs 0.71 per 90).
- Hamulic is estimated to cost far less (€172k vs €938k mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Hamulic (Bargain Index 99 vs 60) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.