Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| James Garner remove | Ethan Ampadu remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 25 | 25 |
| Position | Defensive midfielder | Defensive midfielder |
| Club · league | Everton FC · Premier League | Leeds United · Premier League |
| League strength | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1556 | 1521 |
| League minutes | 3414 (100%) | 3123 (91%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.24 | 0.06 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.18 | 0.08 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 93 | 87 |
| Market value | €45.0M | €30.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €32.7M – €64.9M | €21.1M – €35.7M |
| Model value | €25.9M – €39.1M | €10.6M – €32.5M |
| Projected value (24m) | €28.3M – €51.7M | €22.3M – €40.1M |
| Bargain Index | 27/100 | 34/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Moderate |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Low |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€32.7M – €64.9M Model value (performance-implied)€25.9M – €39.1M Projected value (24 months)€28.3M – €51.7M Dashed line: current market value (€45.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€21.1M – €35.7M Model value (performance-implied)€10.6M – €32.5M Projected value (24 months)€22.3M – €40.1M Dashed line: current market value (€30.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates James Garner and Ethan Ampadu
- Garner has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.18 vs 0.08 per 90).
- Ampadu is estimated to cost far less (€31.0M vs €46.8M mid-estimate).