Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Quilindschy Hartman remove | David Møller Wolfe remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 24 | 24 |
| Position | Left-back | Left-back |
| Club · league | Burnley FC · Premier League | Wolverhampton Wanderers · Premier League |
| League strength | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1343 | 1425 |
| League minutes | 1830 (54%) | 1048 (31%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.25 | 0.17 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.40 | 0.27 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 80 | 77 |
| Market value | €16.0M | €8.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €7.0M – €17.3M | €4.8M – €11.4M |
| Model value | €5.6M – €16.3M | €4.9M – €11.2M |
| Projected value (24m) | €6.9M – €18.6M | €3.9M – €8.5M |
| Bargain Index | 75/100 | 16/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Moderate |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€7.0M – €17.3M Model value (performance-implied)€5.6M – €16.3M Projected value (24 months)€6.9M – €18.6M Dashed line: current market value (€16.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€4.8M – €11.4M Model value (performance-implied)€4.9M – €11.2M Projected value (24 months)€3.9M – €8.5M Dashed line: current market value (€8.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Quilindschy Hartman and David Møller Wolfe
- Hartman was used far more by the club (54% of minutes vs 31%).
- On value for money the model prefers Hartman (Bargain Index 75 vs 16) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Hartman Low, Wolfe Moderate.