Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Eduard Spertsyan remove | Bitello remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 26 | 26 |
| Position | Attacking midfielder | Attacking midfielder |
| Club · league | FK Krasnodar · Premier Liga | FK Dinamo Moskva · Premier Liga |
| League strength | 0.56 | 0.56 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1536 | 1423 |
| League minutes | 2545 (94%) | 2332 (86%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 1.06 | 0.58 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.60 | 0.43 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 85 | 68 |
| Market value | €25.0M | €15.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €14.6M – €26.6M | €8.8M – €17.0M |
| Model value | €8.7M – €29.2M | €1.9M – €13.5M |
| Projected value (24m) | €15.1M – €31.2M | €6.8M – €17.6M |
| Bargain Index | 63/100 | 31/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€14.6M – €26.6M Model value (performance-implied)€8.7M – €29.2M Projected value (24 months)€15.1M – €31.2M Dashed line: current market value (€25.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€8.8M – €17.0M Model value (performance-implied)€1.9M – €13.5M Projected value (24 months)€6.8M – €17.6M Dashed line: current market value (€15.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Eduard Spertsyan and Bitello
- Spertsyan has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.60 vs 0.43 per 90).
- Bitello is estimated to cost far less (€12.8M vs €20.1M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Spertsyan (Bargain Index 63 vs 31) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.