Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Mirlind Daku removeLion Lauberbach remove
Age2828
PositionStrikerStriker
Club · leagueFC Rubin Kazan · Premier LigaKV Mechelen · Jupiler Pro League
League strength0.560.65
Team strength (Elo)13391370
League minutes2063 (76%)1872 (69%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.480.34
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.490.41
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile4437
Market value€9.0M€1.7M
Estimated acquisition€3.9M – €9.7M€686k – €2.2M
Model value€1.2M – €3.4M€677k – €2.2M
Projected value (24m)€3.2M – €8.6M€599k – €1.7M
Bargain Index19/1006/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskHighLow
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€3.9M – €9.7M
Model value (performance-implied)€1.2M – €3.4M
Projected value (24 months)€3.2M – €8.6M
Dashed line: current market value (€9.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€686k – €2.2M
Model value (performance-implied)€677k – €2.2M
Projected value (24 months)€599k – €1.7M
Dashed line: current market value (€1.7M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Mirlind Daku and Lion Lauberbach

  • Lauberbach is estimated to cost far less (€1.4M vs €6.6M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Daku (Bargain Index 19 vs 6) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Daku High, Lauberbach Low.