Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Tobias Bech remove | Daan Rots remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 24 | 24 |
| Position | Right winger | Right winger |
| Club · league | Aarhus GF · Superliga | FC Twente Enschede · Eredivisie |
| League strength | 0.47 | 0.43 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1441 | 1403 |
| League minutes | 1835 (93%) | 2370 (78%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.64 | 0.49 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.37 | 0.37 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 44 | 50 |
| Market value | €4.5M | €5.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €2.5M – €6.7M | €1.7M – €5.0M |
| Model value | €1.3M – €7.7M | €1.4M – €5.8M |
| Projected value (24m) | €2.6M – €8.9M | €2.8M – €7.5M |
| Bargain Index | 69/100 | 96/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€2.5M – €6.7M Model value (performance-implied)€1.3M – €7.7M Projected value (24 months)€2.6M – €8.9M Dashed line: current market value (€4.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€1.7M – €5.0M Model value (performance-implied)€1.4M – €5.8M Projected value (24 months)€2.8M – €7.5M Dashed line: current market value (€5.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Tobias Bech and Daan Rots
- Bech was used far more by the club (93% of minutes vs 78%).
- Rots is estimated to cost far less (€2.3M vs €4.0M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Rots (Bargain Index 96 vs 69) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.