Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Ennio van der Gouw remove | Guillaume Dietsch remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 26 | 25 |
| Position | Goalkeeper | Goalkeeper |
| Club · league | Rio Ave FC · Liga Portugal | FCV Dender EH · Jupiler Pro League |
| League strength | 0.58 | 0.65 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1254 | 1207 |
| League minutes | 900 (29%) | 900 (33%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 10 | 7 |
| Market value | €400k | €250k |
| Estimated acquisition | €154k – €364k | €80k – €334k |
| Model value | €240k – €641k | €280k – €768k |
| Projected value (24m) | €287k – €593k | €139k – €371k |
| Bargain Index | 89/100 | 79/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€154k – €364k Model value (performance-implied)€240k – €641k Projected value (24 months)€287k – €593k Dashed line: current market value (€400k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€80k – €334k Model value (performance-implied)€280k – €768k Projected value (24 months)€139k – €371k Dashed line: current market value (€250k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Ennio van der Gouw and Guillaume Dietsch
- Dietsch is estimated to cost far less (€169k vs €283k mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Gouw (Bargain Index 89 vs 79) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Gouw High, Dietsch Moderate.