Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Jacob Trenskow remove | Mathis Suray remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 25 | 24 |
| Position | Right winger | Left winger |
| Club · league | SC Heerenveen · Eredivisie | Go Ahead Eagles · Eredivisie |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.43 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1284 | 1245 |
| League minutes | 2680 (88%) | 2603 (85%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.57 | 0.48 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.54 | 0.53 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 31 | 29 |
| Market value | €7.5M | €3.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €4.6M – €9.7M | €1.1M – €4.1M |
| Model value | €443k – €2.8M | €449k – €1.9M |
| Projected value (24m) | €3.8M – €12.0M | €2.0M – €4.9M |
| Bargain Index | 43/100 | 95/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€4.6M – €9.7M Model value (performance-implied)€443k – €2.8M Projected value (24 months)€3.8M – €12.0M Dashed line: current market value (€7.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€1.1M – €4.1M Model value (performance-implied)€449k – €1.9M Projected value (24 months)€2.0M – €4.9M Dashed line: current market value (€3.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Jacob Trenskow and Mathis Suray
- Suray is estimated to cost far less (€1.4M vs €6.3M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Suray (Bargain Index 95 vs 43) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.