Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Jeppe Erenbjerg remove | Egas Cacintura remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 26 | 28 |
| Position | Attacking midfielder | Attacking midfielder |
| Club · league | Zulte Waregem · Jupiler Pro League | RFK Akhmat Grozny · Premier Liga |
| League strength | 0.65 | 0.56 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1228 | 1279 |
| League minutes | 2416 (90%) | 2369 (88%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.48 | 0.53 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.66 | 0.56 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 37 | 40 |
| Market value | €4.0M | €2.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €1.8M – €4.5M | €688k – €2.5M |
| Model value | €881k – €2.2M | €1.0M – €2.2M |
| Projected value (24m) | €1.9M – €5.8M | €1.1M – €2.8M |
| Bargain Index | 64/100 | 52/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€1.8M – €4.5M Model value (performance-implied)€881k – €2.2M Projected value (24 months)€1.9M – €5.8M Dashed line: current market value (€4.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€688k – €2.5M Model value (performance-implied)€1.0M – €2.2M Projected value (24 months)€1.1M – €2.8M Dashed line: current market value (€2.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Jeppe Erenbjerg and Egas Cacintura
- Erenbjerg is 3 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- Erenbjerg has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.66 vs 0.56 per 90).
- Cacintura is estimated to cost far less (€1.6M vs €2.9M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Erenbjerg (Bargain Index 64 vs 52) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Erenbjerg Low, Cacintura Moderate.