Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Óscar Gil removeMarco Ilaimaharitra remove
Age2830
PositionRight midfielderDefensive midfielder
Club · leagueOud-Heverlee Leuven · Jupiler Pro LeagueStandard Liège · Jupiler Pro League
League strength0.650.65
Team strength (Elo)13291341
League minutes2023 (75%)1990 (74%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.090.14
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.160.16
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile3637
Market value€800k€800k
Estimated acquisition€214k – €960k€210k – €689k
Model value€702k – €1.8M€526k – €1.5M
Projected value (24m)€321k – €786k€254k – €509k
Bargain Index61/10036/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskLowModerate
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€214k – €960k
Model value (performance-implied)€702k – €1.8M
Projected value (24 months)€321k – €786k
Dashed line: current market value (€800k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€210k – €689k
Model value (performance-implied)€526k – €1.5M
Projected value (24 months)€254k – €509k
Dashed line: current market value (€800k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Óscar Gil and Marco Ilaimaharitra

  • Gil is 3 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Ilaimaharitra is estimated to cost far less (€280k vs €478k mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Gil (Bargain Index 61 vs 36) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Gil Low, Ilaimaharitra Moderate.