Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Troy Parrott remove | Hyeon-gyu Oh remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 24 | 25 |
| Position | Striker | Striker |
| Club · league | AZ Alkmaar · Eredivisie | KRC Genk · Jupiler Pro League |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.65 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1393 | 1411 |
| League minutes | 2206 (72%) | 2197 (72%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.86 | 0.74 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.52 | 0.52 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 65 | 55 |
| Market value | €25.0M | €15.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €17.8M – €34.0M | €10.9M – €22.4M |
| Model value | €3.3M – €16.5M | €2.2M – €12.9M |
| Projected value (24m) | €12.0M – €29.1M | €6.6M – €20.0M |
| Bargain Index | 26/100 | 13/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Low |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€17.8M – €34.0M Model value (performance-implied)€3.3M – €16.5M Projected value (24 months)€12.0M – €29.1M Dashed line: current market value (€25.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€10.9M – €22.4M Model value (performance-implied)€2.2M – €12.9M Projected value (24 months)€6.6M – €20.0M Dashed line: current market value (€15.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Troy Parrott and Hyeon-gyu Oh
- Oh plays in a stronger league (0.65 vs 0.43); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
- Oh is estimated to cost far less (€15.0M vs €24.1M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Parrott (Bargain Index 26 vs 13) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.