Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| José Marsà remove | Nathan Gassama remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 24 | 25 |
| Position | Centre-back | Centre-back |
| Club · league | KV Mechelen · Jupiler Pro League | FK Baltika · Premier Liga |
| League strength | 0.65 | 0.56 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1370 | 1326 |
| League minutes | 1699 (63%) | 1787 (66%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.21 | 0.15 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.16 | 0.13 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 43 | 31 |
| Market value | €3.5M | €1.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €1.4M – €3.7M | €697k – €2.4M |
| Model value | €899k – €3.5M | €697k – €2.0M |
| Projected value (24m) | €1.8M – €3.9M | €820k – €2.6M |
| Bargain Index | 89/100 | 65/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€1.4M – €3.7M Model value (performance-implied)€899k – €3.5M Projected value (24 months)€1.8M – €3.9M Dashed line: current market value (€3.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€697k – €2.4M Model value (performance-implied)€697k – €2.0M Projected value (24 months)€820k – €2.6M Dashed line: current market value (€1.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates José Marsà and Nathan Gassama
- On value for money the model prefers Marsà (Bargain Index 89 vs 65) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Marsà Moderate, Gassama High.