Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Anthony Descotte remove | Said Hamulic remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 22 | 25 |
| Position | Striker | Striker |
| Club · league | FC Volendam · Eredivisie | Volou Neos Podosferikos Syllogos · Super League 1 |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.42 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1121 | 1129 |
| League minutes | 973 (32%) | 1014 (43%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.46 | 0.53 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.71 | 0.71 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 16 | 13 |
| Market value | €600k | €400k |
| Estimated acquisition | €220k – €1.3M | €129k – €526k |
| Model value | €350k – €884k | €322k – €932k |
| Projected value (24m) | €361k – €1.1M | €275k – €596k |
| Bargain Index | 66/100 | 99/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Low |
| Breakout probability | 19% | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€220k – €1.3M Model value (performance-implied)€350k – €884k Projected value (24 months)€361k – €1.1M Dashed line: current market value (€600k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€129k – €526k Model value (performance-implied)€322k – €932k Projected value (24 months)€275k – €596k Dashed line: current market value (€400k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Anthony Descotte and Said Hamulic
- Descotte is 3 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- Hamulic is estimated to cost far less (€172k vs €564k mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Hamulic (Bargain Index 99 vs 66) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Descotte Moderate, Hamulic High.