Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Pape Matar Sarr remove | Tim Iroegbunam remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 23 | 23 |
| Position | Central midfielder | Central midfielder |
| Club · league | Tottenham Hotspur · Premier League | Everton FC · Premier League |
| League strength | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1564 | 1556 |
| League minutes | 1389 (41%) | 1486 (44%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.39 | 0.18 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.35 | 0.21 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 91 | 84 |
| Market value | €30.0M | €18.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €21.5M – €40.1M | €9.3M – €21.1M |
| Model value | €19.8M – €41.0M | €11.5M – €30.3M |
| Projected value (24m) | €19.2M – €37.9M | €11.6M – €34.5M |
| Bargain Index | 23/100 | 86/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Moderate |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€21.5M – €40.1M Model value (performance-implied)€19.8M – €41.0M Projected value (24 months)€19.2M – €37.9M Dashed line: current market value (€30.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€9.3M – €21.1M Model value (performance-implied)€11.5M – €30.3M Projected value (24 months)€11.6M – €34.5M Dashed line: current market value (€18.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Pape Matar Sarr and Tim Iroegbunam
- Sarr has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.35 vs 0.21 per 90).
- Iroegbunam is estimated to cost far less (€12.3M vs €30.9M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Iroegbunam (Bargain Index 86 vs 23) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Sarr Low, Iroegbunam Moderate.