Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Sven Mijnans remove | Dani de Wit remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 26 | 28 |
| Position | Attacking midfielder | Attacking midfielder |
| Club · league | AZ Alkmaar · Eredivisie | FC Utrecht · Eredivisie |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.43 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1393 | 1352 |
| League minutes | 2351 (77%) | 2151 (70%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.65 | 0.46 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.40 | 0.36 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 63 | 56 |
| Market value | €15.0M | €3.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €8.7M – €16.5M | €963k – €3.6M |
| Model value | €2.0M – €8.3M | €1.5M – €3.7M |
| Projected value (24m) | €6.1M – €17.6M | €1.4M – €3.6M |
| Bargain Index | 27/100 | 74/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Low |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€8.7M – €16.5M Model value (performance-implied)€2.0M – €8.3M Projected value (24 months)€6.1M – €17.6M Dashed line: current market value (€15.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€963k – €3.6M Model value (performance-implied)€1.5M – €3.7M Projected value (24 months)€1.4M – €3.6M Dashed line: current market value (€3.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Sven Mijnans and Dani de Wit
- Mijnans is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- Wit is estimated to cost far less (€1.9M vs €12.1M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Wit (Bargain Index 74 vs 27) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.