Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Mimeirhel Benita remove | Déron Payne remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 22 | 23 |
| Position | Right-back | Right-back |
| Club · league | Heracles Almelo · Eredivisie | FC Volendam · Eredivisie |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.43 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1060 | 1101 |
| League minutes | 1448 (47%) | 932 (31%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.06 | 0.00 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 3 | 1 |
| Market value | €500k | €350k |
| Estimated acquisition | €146k – €575k | €77k – €374k |
| Model value | €387k – €500k | €206k – €390k |
| Projected value (24m) | €305k – €805k | €233k – €526k |
| Bargain Index | 79/100 | 90/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Low |
| Breakout probability | 7% | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€146k – €575k Model value (performance-implied)€387k – €500k Projected value (24 months)€305k – €805k Dashed line: current market value (€500k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€77k – €374k Model value (performance-implied)€206k – €390k Projected value (24 months)€233k – €526k Dashed line: current market value (€350k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Mimeirhel Benita and Déron Payne
- Benita was used far more by the club (47% of minutes vs 31%).
- Payne is estimated to cost far less (€220k vs €363k mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Payne (Bargain Index 90 vs 79) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.