Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Mohamed Bayo remove | Kaj Sierhuis remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 28 | 28 |
| Position | Striker | Striker |
| Club · league | Gaziantep FK · Super Lig | Fortuna Sittardia Combinatie · Eredivisie |
| League strength | 0.40 | 0.43 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1167 | 1175 |
| League minutes | 2348 (77%) | 1999 (65%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.69 | 0.63 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.71 | 0.65 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 48 | 32 |
| Market value | €4.5M | €1.8M |
| Estimated acquisition | €1.3M – €3.5M | €681k – €1.8M |
| Model value | €1.2M – €5.0M | €722k – €1.7M |
| Projected value (24m) | €1.7M – €4.6M | €748k – €1.9M |
| Bargain Index | 80/100 | 59/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€1.3M – €3.5M Model value (performance-implied)€1.2M – €5.0M Projected value (24 months)€1.7M – €4.6M Dashed line: current market value (€4.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€681k – €1.8M Model value (performance-implied)€722k – €1.7M Projected value (24 months)€748k – €1.9M Dashed line: current market value (€1.8M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Mohamed Bayo and Kaj Sierhuis
- On value for money the model prefers Bayo (Bargain Index 80 vs 59) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.