Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Tonni Adamsen removeJay-Roy Grot remove
Age3128
PositionStrikerStriker
Club · leagueSilkeborg IF · SuperligaOdense Boldklub · Superliga
League strength0.470.47
Team strength (Elo)12131215
League minutes1818 (92%)1621 (82%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.550.56
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.570.66
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile2516
Market value€1.5M€750k
Estimated acquisition€491k – €1.6M€224k – €665k
Model value€377k – €996k€479k – €1.1M
Projected value (24m)€451k – €1.1M€378k – €945k
Bargain Index35/10094/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskModerateHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€491k – €1.6M
Model value (performance-implied)€377k – €996k
Projected value (24 months)€451k – €1.1M
Dashed line: current market value (€1.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€224k – €665k
Model value (performance-implied)€479k – €1.1M
Projected value (24 months)€378k – €945k
Dashed line: current market value (€750k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Tonni Adamsen and Jay-Roy Grot

  • Grot is 3 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Grot has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.66 vs 0.57 per 90).
  • Grot is estimated to cost far less (€299k vs €789k mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Grot (Bargain Index 94 vs 35) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Adamsen Moderate, Grot High.