Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

James Tavernier removeCláudio Winck remove
Age3432
PositionRight-backRight-back
Club · leagueRangers FC · Scottish PremiershipKasimpasa · Super Lig
League strength0.310.40
Team strength (Elo)14271203
League minutes2170 (73%)2303 (75%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.500.20
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.290.21
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile7638
Market value€500k€800k
Estimated acquisition€110k – €628k€176k – €594k
Model value€659k – €2.4M€338k – €969k
Projected value (24m)€114k – €417k€250k – €523k
Bargain IndexNo index28/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskHighVery High
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€110k – €628k
Model value (performance-implied)€659k – €2.4M
Projected value (24 months)€114k – €417k
Dashed line: current market value (€500k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€176k – €594k
Model value (performance-implied)€338k – €969k
Projected value (24 months)€250k – €523k
Dashed line: current market value (€800k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates James Tavernier and Cláudio Winck

  • Winck is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Risk differs: Tavernier High, Winck Very High.