Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Metehan Altunbaş removeGuilherme Neiva remove
Age2325
PositionLeft wingerLeft winger
Club · leagueEyüpspor · Super LigAvs Futebol · Liga Portugal
League strength0.400.58
Team strength (Elo)12041182
League minutes1006 (33%)923 (30%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.720.49
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.730.80
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile107
Market value€2.0M€300k
Estimated acquisition€1.1M – €3.5M€125k – €562k
Model value€305k – €792k€308k – €777k
Projected value (24m)€1.1M – €4.5M€221k – €464k
Bargain Index58/10098/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskVery HighHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€1.1M – €3.5M
Model value (performance-implied)€305k – €792k
Projected value (24 months)€1.1M – €4.5M
Dashed line: current market value (€2.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€125k – €562k
Model value (performance-implied)€308k – €777k
Projected value (24 months)€221k – €464k
Dashed line: current market value (€300k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Metehan Altunbaş and Guilherme Neiva

  • Neiva plays in a stronger league (0.58 vs 0.40); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
  • Neiva is estimated to cost far less (€166k vs €2.0M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Neiva (Bargain Index 98 vs 58) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Altunbaş Very High, Neiva High.