Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Filippo Terracciano removeDanilo Veiga remove
Age2323
PositionCentre-backRight-back
Club · leagueUS Cremonese · Serie AUS Lecce · Serie A
League strength0.930.93
Team strength (Elo)12991352
League minutes3012 (88%)3022 (88%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.060.03
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.100.09
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile6654
Market value€4.5M€2.5M
Estimated acquisition€2.5M – €6.4M€1.2M – €3.8M
Model value€2.4M – €15.5M€1.7M – €5.2M
Projected value (24m)€2.5M – €10.3M€1.6M – €5.3M
Bargain Index71/10097/100
DevelopmentModerateModerate
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskModerateModerate
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€2.5M – €6.4M
Model value (performance-implied)€2.4M – €15.5M
Projected value (24 months)€2.5M – €10.3M
Dashed line: current market value (€4.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€1.2M – €3.8M
Model value (performance-implied)€1.7M – €5.2M
Projected value (24 months)€1.6M – €5.3M
Dashed line: current market value (€2.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Filippo Terracciano and Danilo Veiga

  • Veiga is estimated to cost far less (€1.6M vs €4.4M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Veiga (Bargain Index 97 vs 71) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.