Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Martin Vitík removeAndrew Omobamidele remove
Age2324
PositionCentre-backCentre-back
Club · leagueBologna Football Club 1909 · Serie ARC Strasbourg Alsace · Ligue 1
League strength0.930.88
Team strength (Elo)15231502
League minutes1324 (39%)1352 (44%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.000.07
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.030.07
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile6155
Market value€13.0M€8.0M
Estimated acquisition€9.7M – €19.1M€5.5M – €12.6M
Model value€1.7M – €8.2M€2.1M – €8.3M
Projected value (24m)€6.9M – €22.7M€3.5M – €11.0M
Bargain Index35/10024/100
DevelopmentModerateModerate
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskModerateLow
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€9.7M – €19.1M
Model value (performance-implied)€1.7M – €8.2M
Projected value (24 months)€6.9M – €22.7M
Dashed line: current market value (€13.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€5.5M – €12.6M
Model value (performance-implied)€2.1M – €8.3M
Projected value (24 months)€3.5M – €11.0M
Dashed line: current market value (€8.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Martin Vitík and Andrew Omobamidele

  • Omobamidele is estimated to cost far less (€7.9M vs €13.6M mid-estimate).
  • On value for money the model prefers Vitík (Bargain Index 35 vs 24) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Vitík Moderate, Omobamidele Low.