Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Jota Silva remove | Cengiz Ünder remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 26 | 28 |
| Position | Left winger | Right winger |
| Club · league | Beşiktaş Jimnastik Kulübü · Super Lig | Beşiktaş Jimnastik Kulübü · Super Lig |
| League strength | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1356 | 1351 |
| League minutes | 586 (17%) | 1173 (38%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.92 | 0.61 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.51 | 0.43 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 70 | 47 |
| Market value | €10.0M | €4.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €3.4M – €8.1M | €1.1M – €3.0M |
| Model value | €2.5M – €11.7M | €1.4M – €3.6M |
| Projected value (24m) | €3.5M – €10.0M | €934k – €3.6M |
| Bargain Index | No index | 43/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Very High | Very High |
| Data confidence | Low | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€3.4M – €8.1M Model value (performance-implied)€2.5M – €11.7M Projected value (24 months)€3.5M – €10.0M Dashed line: current market value (€10.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€1.1M – €3.0M Model value (performance-implied)€1.4M – €3.6M Projected value (24 months)€934k – €3.6M Dashed line: current market value (€4.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Jota Silva and Cengiz Ünder
- Silva is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- Ünder was used far more by the club (38% of minutes vs 17%).
- Ünder is estimated to cost far less (€1.4M vs €4.5M mid-estimate).