Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Tim Iroegbunam remove | Ao Tanaka remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 23 | 27 |
| Position | Central midfielder | Central midfielder |
| Club · league | Everton FC · Premier League | Leeds United · Premier League |
| League strength | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1556 | 1521 |
| League minutes | 1486 (44%) | 1318 (39%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.18 | 0.14 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.21 | 0.22 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 84 | 79 |
| Market value | €18.0M | €13.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €9.3M – €21.1M | €6.5M – €14.2M |
| Model value | €11.5M – €30.3M | €5.2M – €16.0M |
| Projected value (24m) | €11.6M – €34.5M | €5.2M – €13.6M |
| Bargain Index | 86/100 | 21/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€9.3M – €21.1M Model value (performance-implied)€11.5M – €30.3M Projected value (24 months)€11.6M – €34.5M Dashed line: current market value (€18.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€6.5M – €14.2M Model value (performance-implied)€5.2M – €16.0M Projected value (24 months)€5.2M – €13.6M Dashed line: current market value (€13.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Tim Iroegbunam and Ao Tanaka
- Iroegbunam is 5 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- On value for money the model prefers Iroegbunam (Bargain Index 86 vs 21) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.