Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Yerson Mosquera remove | Hjalmar Ekdal remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 25 | 27 |
| Position | Centre-back | Centre-back |
| Club · league | Wolverhampton Wanderers · Premier League | Burnley FC · Premier League |
| League strength | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1425 | 1343 |
| League minutes | 2143 (63%) | 1540 (45%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 76 | 69 |
| Market value | €12.0M | €5.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €7.7M – €19.0M | €2.2M – €5.9M |
| Model value | €5.9M – €15.0M | €2.5M – €6.2M |
| Projected value (24m) | €7.0M – €17.6M | €2.1M – €4.0M |
| Bargain Index | 26/100 | 62/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€7.7M – €19.0M Model value (performance-implied)€5.9M – €15.0M Projected value (24 months)€7.0M – €17.6M Dashed line: current market value (€12.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€2.2M – €5.9M Model value (performance-implied)€2.5M – €6.2M Projected value (24 months)€2.1M – €4.0M Dashed line: current market value (€5.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Yerson Mosquera and Hjalmar Ekdal
- Mosquera is 3 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- Mosquera was used far more by the club (63% of minutes vs 45%).
- Ekdal is estimated to cost far less (€2.9M vs €12.6M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Ekdal (Bargain Index 62 vs 26) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Mosquera Low, Ekdal Moderate.