Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Nicolò Tresoldi remove | Promise David remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 21 | 24 |
| Position | Striker | Striker |
| Club · league | Club Brugge KV · Jupiler Pro League | Union Saint-Gilloise · Jupiler Pro League |
| League strength | 0.65 | 0.65 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1589 | 1570 |
| League minutes | 1811 (67%) | 1498 (56%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.80 | 0.66 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.45 | 0.43 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 76 | 71 |
| Market value | €25.0M | €17.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €20.0M – €36.6M | €13.8M – €23.7M |
| Model value | €4.7M – €28.3M | €4.7M – €12.9M |
| Projected value (24m) | €16.0M – €53.6M | €8.3M – €29.1M |
| Bargain Index | 39/100 | 30/100 |
| Development | High | Moderate |
| Breakout probability | 13% | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€20.0M – €36.6M Model value (performance-implied)€4.7M – €28.3M Projected value (24 months)€16.0M – €53.6M Dashed line: current market value (€25.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€13.8M – €23.7M Model value (performance-implied)€4.7M – €12.9M Projected value (24 months)€8.3M – €29.1M Dashed line: current market value (€17.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Nicolò Tresoldi and Promise David
- Tresoldi is 3 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- David is estimated to cost far less (€18.0M vs €29.2M mid-estimate).
- Risk differs: Tresoldi Low, David Moderate.