Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Thijmen Blokzijl remove | Anselmo García MacNulty remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 21 | 23 |
| Position | Centre-back | Centre-back |
| Club · league | FC Groningen · Eredivisie | PEC Zwolle · Eredivisie |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.43 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1248 | 1186 |
| League minutes | 3047 (100%) | 2845 (93%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 31 | 22 |
| Market value | €4.0M | €1.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €1.8M – €5.2M | €552k – €2.3M |
| Model value | €758k – €1.3M | €376k – €1.2M |
| Projected value (24m) | €2.5M – €11.2M | €814k – €2.6M |
| Bargain Index | 99/100 | 66/100 |
| Development | High | Low |
| Breakout probability | 33% | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€1.8M – €5.2M Model value (performance-implied)€758k – €1.3M Projected value (24 months)€2.5M – €11.2M Dashed line: current market value (€4.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€552k – €2.3M Model value (performance-implied)€376k – €1.2M Projected value (24 months)€814k – €2.6M Dashed line: current market value (€1.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Thijmen Blokzijl and Anselmo García MacNulty
- Blokzijl is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- MacNulty is estimated to cost far less (€1.3M vs €2.4M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Blokzijl (Bargain Index 99 vs 66) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Blokzijl High, MacNulty Moderate.