Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Bernt Klaverboer remove | Tom de Graaff remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 20 | 21 |
| Position | Goalkeeper | Goalkeeper |
| Club · league | SC Heerenveen · Eredivisie | PEC Zwolle · Eredivisie |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.43 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1284 | 1186 |
| League minutes | 2610 (85%) | 2790 (91%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 17 | 11 |
| Market value | €3.0M | €1.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €1.6M – €4.3M | €517k – €2.2M |
| Model value | €434k – €1.7M | €387k – €883k |
| Projected value (24m) | €2.0M – €8.4M | €789k – €3.5M |
| Bargain Index | 96/100 | 83/100 |
| Development | High | High |
| Breakout probability | 28% | 41% |
| Risk | High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€1.6M – €4.3M Model value (performance-implied)€434k – €1.7M Projected value (24 months)€2.0M – €8.4M Dashed line: current market value (€3.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€517k – €2.2M Model value (performance-implied)€387k – €883k Projected value (24 months)€789k – €3.5M Dashed line: current market value (€1.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Bernt Klaverboer and Tom de Graaff
- Graaff is estimated to cost far less (€974k vs €2.1M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Klaverboer (Bargain Index 96 vs 83) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.