Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Emersonn remove | Mateo Joseph remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 21 | 22 |
| Position | Striker | Striker |
| Club · league | FC Toulouse · Ligue 1 | RCD Mallorca · Laliga |
| League strength | 0.88 | 0.95 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1430 | 1421 |
| League minutes | 1628 (53%) | 1704 (50%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.50 | 0.32 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.47 | 0.42 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 46 | 64 |
| Market value | €8.0M | €3.5M |
| Estimated acquisition | €6.1M – €16.0M | €1.8M – €6.0M |
| Model value | €2.5M – €8.8M | €4.9M – €17.3M |
| Projected value (24m) | €4.8M – €21.1M | €2.2M – €7.4M |
| Bargain Index | 53/100 | 65/100 |
| Development | High | High |
| Breakout probability | 30% | 23% |
| Risk | High | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€6.1M – €16.0M Model value (performance-implied)€2.5M – €8.8M Projected value (24 months)€4.8M – €21.1M Dashed line: current market value (€8.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€1.8M – €6.0M Model value (performance-implied)€4.9M – €17.3M Projected value (24 months)€2.2M – €7.4M Dashed line: current market value (€3.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Emersonn and Mateo Joseph
- Joseph is estimated to cost far less (€3.7M vs €10.6M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Joseph (Bargain Index 65 vs 53) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
- Risk differs: Emersonn High, Joseph Moderate.