Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Andrey Santos remove | Tim Iroegbunam remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 22 | 23 |
| Position | Central midfielder | Central midfielder |
| Club · league | Chelsea FC · Premier League | Everton FC · Premier League |
| League strength | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1615 | 1556 |
| League minutes | 1255 (37%) | 1486 (44%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.07 | 0.18 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.10 | 0.21 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 86 | 84 |
| Market value | €40.0M | €18.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €29.0M – €52.9M | €9.3M – €21.1M |
| Model value | €18.8M – €47.0M | €11.5M – €30.3M |
| Projected value (24m) | €23.7M – €50.8M | €11.6M – €34.5M |
| Bargain Index | 35/100 | 86/100 |
| Development | High | Moderate |
| Breakout probability | 5% | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€29.0M – €52.9M Model value (performance-implied)€18.8M – €47.0M Projected value (24 months)€23.7M – €50.8M Dashed line: current market value (€40.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€9.3M – €21.1M Model value (performance-implied)€11.5M – €30.3M Projected value (24 months)€11.6M – €34.5M Dashed line: current market value (€18.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Andrey Santos and Tim Iroegbunam
- Iroegbunam has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.21 vs 0.10 per 90).
- Iroegbunam is estimated to cost far less (€12.3M vs €41.3M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Iroegbunam (Bargain Index 86 vs 35) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.