Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Francis Coquelin removeNathan Rôdes remove
Age3528
PositionDefensive midfielderDefensive midfielder
Club · leagueFC Nantes · Ligue 1FCV Dender EH · Jupiler Pro League
League strength0.880.65
Team strength (Elo)13041207
League minutes655 (21%)1463 (54%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.140.00
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.180.07
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile4519
Market value€700k€600k
Estimated acquisition€208k – €610k€176k – €455k
Model value€301k – €645k€452k – €1.5M
Projected value (24m)€248k – €688k€210k – €590k
Bargain IndexNo index73/100
DevelopmentLowLow
Breakout probabilityn/a (age > 23)n/a (age > 23)
RiskVery HighHigh
Data confidenceLowMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€208k – €610k
Model value (performance-implied)€301k – €645k
Projected value (24 months)€248k – €688k
Dashed line: current market value (€700k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€176k – €455k
Model value (performance-implied)€452k – €1.5M
Projected value (24 months)€210k – €590k
Dashed line: current market value (€600k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Francis Coquelin and Nathan Rôdes

  • Rôdes is 7 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
  • Coquelin plays in a stronger league (0.88 vs 0.65); the other's output carries more translation uncertainty.
  • Coquelin has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.18 vs 0.07 per 90).
  • Rôdes was used far more by the club (54% of minutes vs 21%).
  • Risk differs: Coquelin Very High, Rôdes High.