Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Dies Janse remove | Ümit Akdağ remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 20 | 22 |
| Position | Centre-back | Centre-back |
| Club · league | FC Groningen · Eredivisie | Alanyaspor · Super Lig |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.40 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1248 | 1229 |
| League minutes | 2724 (89%) | 2624 (86%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.13 | 0.10 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.13 | 0.10 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 29 | 32 |
| Market value | €6.5M | €6.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €4.8M – €10.5M | €3.2M – €9.3M |
| Model value | €544k – €3.0M | €719k – €2.5M |
| Projected value (24m) | €4.3M – €18.8M | €3.3M – €13.4M |
| Bargain Index | 57/100 | 69/100 |
| Development | Very High | High |
| Breakout probability | 37% | 26% |
| Risk | High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€4.8M – €10.5M Model value (performance-implied)€544k – €3.0M Projected value (24 months)€4.3M – €18.8M Dashed line: current market value (€6.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€3.2M – €9.3M Model value (performance-implied)€719k – €2.5M Projected value (24 months)€3.3M – €13.4M Dashed line: current market value (€6.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Dies Janse and Ümit Akdağ
- Janse is 2 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- On value for money the model prefers Akdağ (Bargain Index 69 vs 57) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.