Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Stije Resink remove | Novatus Miroshi remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 23 | 23 |
| Position | Defensive midfielder | Defensive midfielder |
| Club · league | FC Groningen · Eredivisie | Göztepe · Super Lig |
| League strength | 0.43 | 0.40 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1248 | 1281 |
| League minutes | 2090 (68%) | 2256 (74%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.43 | 0.16 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.31 | 0.20 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 26 | 29 |
| Market value | €7.0M | €5.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €3.7M – €8.9M | €2.2M – €7.3M |
| Model value | €451k – €1.3M | €669k – €1.2M |
| Projected value (24m) | €3.4M – €12.0M | €2.7M – €8.8M |
| Bargain Index | 54/100 | 71/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€3.7M – €8.9M Model value (performance-implied)€451k – €1.3M Projected value (24 months)€3.4M – €12.0M Dashed line: current market value (€7.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€2.2M – €7.3M Model value (performance-implied)€669k – €1.2M Projected value (24 months)€2.7M – €8.8M Dashed line: current market value (€5.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Stije Resink and Novatus Miroshi
- Resink has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.31 vs 0.20 per 90).
- Miroshi is estimated to cost far less (€4.3M vs €6.5M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Miroshi (Bargain Index 71 vs 54) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.