Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| André remove | Florentino remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 24 | 26 |
| Position | Defensive midfielder | Defensive midfielder |
| Club · league | Wolverhampton Wanderers · Premier League | Burnley FC · Premier League |
| League strength | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1425 | 1347 |
| League minutes | 2766 (81%) | 2149 (63%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.03 | 0.08 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.06 | 0.13 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 81 | 85 |
| Market value | €25.0M | €16.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €16.5M – €34.2M | €8.3M – €20.0M |
| Model value | €9.6M – €21.5M | €8.3M – €23.5M |
| Projected value (24m) | €15.2M – €34.9M | €6.7M – €13.6M |
| Bargain Index | 24/100 | 9/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Low | Low |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€16.5M – €34.2M Model value (performance-implied)€9.6M – €21.5M Projected value (24 months)€15.2M – €34.9M Dashed line: current market value (€25.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€8.3M – €20.0M Model value (performance-implied)€8.3M – €23.5M Projected value (24 months)€6.7M – €13.6M Dashed line: current market value (€16.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates André and Florentino
- André was used far more by the club (81% of minutes vs 63%).
- Florentino is estimated to cost far less (€14.9M vs €26.2M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers André (Bargain Index 24 vs 9) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.