Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Nathan Gassama remove | Ousmane N'Dong remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 25 | 26 |
| Position | Centre-back | Centre-back |
| Club · league | FK Baltika · Premier Liga | RFK Akhmat Grozny · Premier Liga |
| League strength | 0.56 | 0.56 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1326 | 1279 |
| League minutes | 1787 (66%) | 1928 (71%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.15 | 0.09 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.13 | 0.10 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 31 | 28 |
| Market value | €1.5M | €1.2M |
| Estimated acquisition | €697k – €2.4M | €433k – €1.3M |
| Model value | €697k – €2.0M | €620k – €1.4M |
| Projected value (24m) | €820k – €2.6M | €598k – €1.9M |
| Bargain Index | 65/100 | 48/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€697k – €2.4M Model value (performance-implied)€697k – €2.0M Projected value (24 months)€820k – €2.6M Dashed line: current market value (€1.5M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€433k – €1.3M Model value (performance-implied)€620k – €1.4M Projected value (24 months)€598k – €1.9M Dashed line: current market value (€1.2M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Nathan Gassama and Ousmane N'Dong
- On value for money the model prefers Gassama (Bargain Index 65 vs 48) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.