Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Farès Chaïbi remove | Kamory Doumbia remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 23 | 23 |
| Position | Attacking midfielder | Attacking midfielder |
| Club · league | Eintracht Frankfurt · Bundesliga | Stade Brestois 29 · Ligue 1 |
| League strength | 0.94 | 0.88 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1445 | 1407 |
| League minutes | 1797 (59%) | 1766 (58%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.55 | 0.46 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.43 | 0.43 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 76 | 62 |
| Market value | €15.0M | €9.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €10.5M – €21.2M | €5.8M – €13.5M |
| Model value | €7.5M – €25.3M | €3.6M – €14.9M |
| Projected value (24m) | €6.9M – €23.9M | €4.2M – €15.1M |
| Bargain Index | 55/100 | 45/100 |
| Development | Moderate | Moderate |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€10.5M – €21.2M Model value (performance-implied)€7.5M – €25.3M Projected value (24 months)€6.9M – €23.9M Dashed line: current market value (€15.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€5.8M – €13.5M Model value (performance-implied)€3.6M – €14.9M Projected value (24 months)€4.2M – €15.1M Dashed line: current market value (€9.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Farès Chaïbi and Kamory Doumbia
- Doumbia is estimated to cost far less (€8.8M vs €14.2M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Chaïbi (Bargain Index 55 vs 45) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.