Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Alan Minda remove | André Lacximicant remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 23 | 25 |
| Position | Striker | Striker |
| Club · league | Cercle Brugge · Jupiler Pro League | GD Estoril Praia · Liga Portugal |
| League strength | 0.65 | 0.58 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1325 | 1305 |
| League minutes | 969 (36%) | 1213 (40%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.56 | 0.37 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.57 | 0.48 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 24 | 21 |
| Market value | €3.0M | €800k |
| Estimated acquisition | €1.4M – €4.5M | €360k – €1.1M |
| Model value | €810k – €3.0M | €432k – €1.3M |
| Projected value (24m) | €1.2M – €4.4M | €482k – €1.3M |
| Bargain Index | 18/100 | 72/100 |
| Development | Low | Low |
| Breakout probability | n/a (age > 23) | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | High | High |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€1.4M – €4.5M Model value (performance-implied)€810k – €3.0M Projected value (24 months)€1.2M – €4.4M Dashed line: current market value (€3.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€360k – €1.1M Model value (performance-implied)€432k – €1.3M Projected value (24 months)€482k – €1.3M Dashed line: current market value (€800k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Alan Minda and André Lacximicant
- Minda has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.57 vs 0.48 per 90).
- Lacximicant is estimated to cost far less (€659k vs €3.0M mid-estimate).
- On value for money the model prefers Lacximicant (Bargain Index 72 vs 18) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.