Player Comparison
Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.
| Lewis Miley remove | Tim Iroegbunam remove | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 20 | 23 |
| Position | Central midfielder | Central midfielder |
| Club · league | Newcastle United · Premier League | Everton FC · Premier League |
| League strength | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| Team strength (Elo) | 1631 | 1556 |
| League minutes | 1494 (44%) | 1486 (44%) |
| G+A per 90 (raw) | 0.30 | 0.18 |
| G+A per 90 (context-adjusted) | 0.23 | 0.21 |
| Passing / defending / progression | Data unavailable | Data unavailable |
| Performance percentile | 89 | 84 |
| Market value | €25.0M | €18.0M |
| Estimated acquisition | €19.2M – €36.7M | €9.3M – €21.1M |
| Model value | €22.1M – €43.6M | €11.5M – €30.3M |
| Projected value (24m) | €19.4M – €64.7M | €11.6M – €34.5M |
| Bargain Index | 81/100 | 86/100 |
| Development | Very High | Moderate |
| Breakout probability | 20% | n/a (age > 23) |
| Risk | Moderate | Moderate |
| Data confidence | Medium | Medium |
| Value picture | Estimated acquisition€19.2M – €36.7M Model value (performance-implied)€22.1M – €43.6M Projected value (24 months)€19.4M – €64.7M Dashed line: current market value (€25.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. | Estimated acquisition€9.3M – €21.1M Model value (performance-implied)€11.5M – €30.3M Projected value (24 months)€11.6M – €34.5M Dashed line: current market value (€18.0M). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median. |
What separates Lewis Miley and Tim Iroegbunam
- Miley is 3 years younger, which the models associate with more appreciation and resale potential.
- Iroegbunam is estimated to cost far less (€12.3M vs €27.0M mid-estimate).