Player Comparison

Side by side on performance, context, cost and risk. Differences are explained — no single 'better player' verdict.

Sem van Duijn removeMilan Zonneveld remove
Age2222
PositionStrikerStriker
Club · leagueSC Telstar · EredivisieSC Telstar · Eredivisie
League strength0.430.43
Team strength (Elo)12161215
League minutes1013 (33%)1078 (35%)
G+A per 90 (raw)0.620.67
G+A per 90 (context-adjusted)0.640.55
Passing / defending / progressionData unavailableData unavailable
Performance percentile77
Market value€800k€450k
Estimated acquisition€392k – €1.5M€226k – €1.1M
Model value€324k – €665k€283k – €631k
Projected value (24m)€488k – €2.2M€306k – €864k
Bargain Index93/10054/100
DevelopmentModerateModerate
Breakout probability19%21%
RiskVery HighHigh
Data confidenceMediumMedium
Value picture
Estimated acquisition€392k – €1.5M
Model value (performance-implied)€324k – €665k
Projected value (24 months)€488k – €2.2M
Dashed line: current market value (€800k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.
Estimated acquisition€226k – €1.1M
Model value (performance-implied)€283k – €631k
Projected value (24 months)€306k – €864k
Dashed line: current market value (€450k). Bars are 20–80% model ranges; tick = median.

What separates Sem van Duijn and Milan Zonneveld

  • Duijn has higher context-adjusted goal contributions (0.64 vs 0.55 per 90).
  • On value for money the model prefers Duijn (Bargain Index 93 vs 54) — this is not a statement about who is the better player.
  • Risk differs: Duijn Very High, Zonneveld High.